COPY RIGHTS NOTICE

STEAL THIS BLOG!

This is the personal blog of Rick Staggenborg, MD. The opinions expressed here do not necessarily reflect the official positions of Take Back America for the People, an educational 501.c3 nonprofit established by Dr Staggenborg.

Feel free to reproduce any blogs by Dr Staggenborg without prior permission, as long as they are unedited and posted or printed with attribution and a link to the website.

For other blogs, please contact the author for permission.


Saturday, March 15, 2025

LIVE THE WORLD YOU ARE TRYING TO CREATE



                                                                    





However hard we try to deny or forget it, we are facing twin existential threats: the climate crisis and nuclear war. These are not unrelated. Wars are fought for resources, none more important than fossil fuels. They create prodigious amounts of greenhouse gases, and divert money that could be spent on climate mitigation and creating a just transition away from fossil fuels We cannot address the climate crisis until we end war.


Most people, including many of those who have spent decades trying to eliminate the scourge of war, believe that war is inevitable. We had better get over that in a hurry unless we are prepared to face the end in our lifetimes. If there is still hope to avoid both of these existential threats, it will require Americans to wake up to the reality that their fates are inextricably intertwined with those of everyone else.

This kind of tectonic paradigm shift in our collective consciousness would a tall order on any time scale, but as Kuhn showed in The Structure of Scientific Revolutions, such shifts may occur rapidly when conditions are right. The urgency of the moment requires us to assume that is possible and to do all we can to promote it if we are to prevent nuclear war and/or environmental collapse.

To create a new world, we must first envision what that world would look like before developing a strategy to get there. If we want a world where most people implicitly recognize our interdependence, we must shed our violent habits of thought. Treating politics as warfare, where those of different ideologies are "the Other," if not enemies outright, is to perpetuate the world that we want to change.

Whatever strategy we develop to achieve our ultimate goal of universal justice, we must assume that some of those who currently oppose us are potential allies. Liberals and progressives alike seem to have given up on the idea that minds can change as circumstance do. By isolating from each other, both have allowed their worldviews to diverge to the point where the seem to have nothing in common with those who view the world differently.

We must be prepared to listen and acknowledge points of commonality in our opposing worldviews in a spirit of respect if we are to create the kind of movement capable of stopping our headlong rush toward oblivion. 

I wrote the following for my local newspaper, but it hasn't been published yet. If it doesn't change your mind about the value of trying to treat the "other side" respectfully, I hope that you will at least consider the arguments carefully.



The suppression of free speech on campus took an ominous step toward fascism with the recent arrest of a nonviolent student protester in New York. This should concern any American who assumes they are protected by the Bill of Rights.

On March 8, Mahmoud Khalil, a lawful permanent U.S. resident married to an American, was abducted by plainclothes DHS agents in front of his eight-months pregnant wife. His family and lawyer were not told where he would be taken. Eventually, they discovered he had been transported to an ICE facility in Louisiana that is notorious for detainee abuse. He has not been charged with any crime.

Khalil’s offense was that he had been a student leader in last year’s Columbia University protests against Israel’s genocide in Gaza.

Columbia has been a prime target of government pressure to suppress campus protest against US complicity in Israeli war crimes. The site of the first Gaza encampment, students there remain defiant despite draconian efforts by the university to coerce them into silence. These include mass arrests, academic sanctions including expulsion, and banning of student groups, including Jewish Voice for Peace.

Khalil’s arrest came one day after Columbia was notified that $400 million in federal grants had been cancelled. The government outrageously claims that Columbia has made insufficient efforts to combat “antisemitism.” That’s the term both the Biden and Trump administrations have used to characterize student protests against Israeli atrocities. To emphasize the message to others, 60 more universities have received warning letters that they are also being investigated.

America has seen a lot of protest in recent history, from across the political spectrum. Most complaints concern problems rooted in the corrupting influence of money in politics. The ability of corporations, the ultrarich and unregistered agents of foreign governments like American Israeli Public Affairs Committee to spend virtually unlimited amounts to influence elections has become a danger to the Republic.

Most politicians pay far more attention to the wishes of the donor class than to the needs of voters. As a result, people on both sides of the political divide demand radical change. From the rise of the Tea Party to insurgent campaigns by Bernie Sanders and Donald Trump, signs of revolt are everywhere. This terrifies the political and economic elites. That is why our rights are being trampled by both parties.

Active suppression of free speech is nothing new. Remember Biden’s Ministry of Truth proposal? He tried to create a State Department office that was to be tasked with determining what information is “misinformation.” Its principal purpose was to censor any evidence that the government was misleading the public in its efforts to demonize Russia after Trump “threatened” to normalize relations.

Whatever one’s opinion on Israel’s actions in Gaza and elsewhere, each of us should be concerned about arbitrary abuse of power to punish individuals who are doing nothing more than peacefully protesting government policy. If we permit this, the First Amendment rights of anyone to assemble, speak publicly, and petition the government for redress of their grievances will be threatened.

Or, as Michelle Goldberg commented in a New York Times editorial entitled This is the Greatest Threat to Free Speech since the Red Scare, “….a government this willing to disregard the First Amendment is a danger to us all.”

Ideological warfare has kept us fighting each other instead of the real enemy among us. Due to our system of privately financed elections, those of means who consistently put profit over the American people are close to destroying any prospect of representative government in the United States.

Americans must unite to save it.

Saturday, March 1, 2025

TRANSCENDING PARTISANSHIP TO FORGE A REAL REVOLUTION


I attended the February 50501 protest in Salem (OR) just to see if anyone besides me would show up in a keffiyeh. Predicably, I was alone in a sea of F*** Trump signs and others indicating outrage at the Republican-dominated government. I wondered what, if anything, the organizers planned to do with all that anger. That got me to thinking about something that had been percolating in my mind since I took the picture above, which made me ponder how the couple that lived in that house managed to live together despite being on opposite sides in the 2024 election. People who are serious about defeating authoritarianism are coming to understand that to succeed, the struggle needs to be nonpartisan.
Americans cannot rule themselves as long as they are fighting each other instead of the oligarchy. How can we claim to represent the popular will when we won't talk to anyone with a different political outlook?
To speak of the 99% is farcical when those invoking it don't even represent a clear majority. Fortunately, a lot of people are starting to look beyond the artificial Left-Right dichotomy to see the way forward. That starts with abandoning identification with any party. There's nothing wrong with working within parties to support candidates willing to represent our interest over those of the oligarchy. Such people exist but are not given the support they need to be in a position to change things, as I learned when I ran for the US Senate in 2010. For those who recognize that whatever else we do, we still need to elect a government that serves us, here is my advice: Look for candidates willing to forego corporate backing who will support a constitutional amendment abolishing corporate personhood and the the Supreme Court doctrine that money spent to influence elections is speech protected under the First Amendment. Ask elected officials and their challengers if they will pledge to do that, and hold them responsible. Check out the Pledge to Amend campaign to see more. I had been meaning to expand on these ideas for some time. I was pleased to learn that Scot Nakagawa has already explored the problem and how to address it in the article below.


Fighting Authoritarianism Beyond Left vs. Right

A People-Powered Movement


Scot Nakagawa


The U.S. is teetering on the edge of authoritarianism. As Trump consolidates power and Musk moves to privatize governance itself, we are seeing the makings of an administrative coup—one that threatens to dismantle democracy and replace it with corporate feudalism. But here’s the problem: too many people see this crisis as a partisan issue, as if authoritarianism is just another battle between Democrats and Republicans. That framing is a trap.

The fight against authoritarianism must be nonpartisan, and more than that, it must be rooted in something deeper than political ideology. It has to be built on the fundamental understanding that you are me and I am you—that our fates are intertwined, and authoritarian rule threatens all of us, regardless of our party affiliations. If we don’t organize around this truth, we will remain divided, leaving the door wide open for the ruling elite to consolidate their control.

Reframing the Struggle: Authoritarianism as a Ruling Class Problem

Authoritarianism is not a grassroots movement. It’s not an uprising of the people. It’s a top-down, elite-driven power grab designed to strip us of our rights, concentrate wealth, and silence dissent. And it’s not exclusive to the Republican Party or the political right—it’s a tool used by the wealthy and powerful to dismantle democracy and replace it with a system where they make the rules, and we just suffer the consequences.

When Trump and Musk undermine the administrative state, stack courts with loyalists, and privatize public institutions, they aren’t doing it to serve working people. They are doing it to cement an elite-controlled government that serves billionaires, not citizens and residents of the U.S.

This is why authoritarianism isn’t a simple left vs. right issue. It’s a ruling class vs. the people issue.

The mistake we must avoid is treating this struggle as just another partisan battle. That plays right into their hands. Authoritarians thrive on division. If we allow our resistance to be framed as a Democratic project, we alienate millions of people who oppose authoritarian rule but don’t trust the Democratic Party. And let’s be honest—the Democratic Party’s historic failures to stand up for working people, its ties to corporate donors, and its lackluster defense of democracy haven’t exactly inspired confidence.

We have to build a movement that is independent of party politics. A movement that speaks to people’s lived experiences, not just their political beliefs. And that means organizing around shared values, not party lines.


The Problem With a Purely Partisan Resistance

  1. It leaves millions of potential allies behind. Not everyone who opposes authoritarianism identifies as progressive or leftist. Many conservatives, independents, and libertarians value democracy, civil liberties, and local self-governance. A partisan approach alienates people who should be standing with us.

  2. It allows authoritarians to manipulate divisions. Trump and Musk frame democracy as a leftist project to keep their base in line. By allowing this narrative to dominate, we make it easier for them to mobilize their supporters against democracy itself.

  3. It ignores the role of corporate elites in driving authoritarianism. Neoliberalism has concentrated wealth and power in the hands of an unaccountable elite, creating the conditions for authoritarian rule. The fight against authoritarianism is also a fight against corporate control over public life.


How We Fight Back: A Nonpartisan, People-Powered Resistance

1. Build Coalitions Based on Shared Democratic Values, Not Ideology

This movement isn’t about being progressive or conservative—it’s about protecting the democratic potential of the U.S, individual freedoms, and community control over public life. We need to unite people around fundamental democratic principles like free and fair elections, the right to dissent, and the idea that government should serve the people, not corporate oligarchs.

Ask people: Do you believe in freedom? Do you think billionaires should run the government? Should workers have rights, remembering that whatever employment we have, our employers aren’t just buying our labor with our wages, they are buying our free time, our freedom? Should the law apply equally to everyone? These are the questions that build broad-based solidarity.

2. Connect the Fight Against Authoritarianism to Economic Justice

People experiencing economic hardship are more susceptible to authoritarian strongmen who promise order and stability. If we fail to address economic injustice, we leave millions of working-class people without a reason to resist authoritarianism.

We must expose how Musk, Trump, and the billionaire class use authoritarian tactics to suppress labor, privatize public resources, and control information. A movement that fights authoritarianism without fighting economic exploitation is doomed to fail.

3. Take Back the Meaning of Freedom

Authoritarians manipulate the language of “freedom” to justify authoritarian rule. They claim that “freedom” means deregulating corporations, gutting public institutions, and silencing opposition. We must redefine freedom as something that belongs to the people—not the state, not corporations, and not billionaires.

💡 True freedom means:

  • The freedom to vote without intimidation.

  • The freedom to earn a living wage without corporate exploitation.

  • The freedom to make personal decisions about your body and future.

  • The freedom to organize, protest, and speak truth to power without fear of violence or repression.

  • The freedom to balance work with time with our families, friends, communities, and ourselves and our free thoughts, musings, and imaginings.

4. Prepare for Mass Direct Action & Economic Disruption

Authoritarianism will not be stopped through elections alone. We must be ready to disrupt the economic and political systems that sustain it. That means:

  • Organizing general strikes to shut down the economy if an authoritarian government tries to consolidate power.

  • Creating sanctuary states and cities that refuse to comply with anti-democratic laws.

  • Mass mobilization in workplaces, schools, and communities to resist authoritarian policies before they take root.

Learn from global movements—from the labor strikes that helped defeat Pinochet in Chile, to the protests that toppled authoritarian regimes in Eastern Europe. We must build the capacity for large-scale, coordinated resistance.

The Takeaway: We Must Build the Future We Want, Not Just Fight Against the Present We Fear

The fight against authoritarianism cannot just be about stopping Trump or Musk. It has to be about creating a world where democracy is real—where ordinary people have power, where corporations don’t rule, and where freedom isn’t just a slogan used to justify oppression.

This is not an argument we can only make through discourse. We must tap our deepest desires, embrace our sensual selves, and inform our dreaming selves while building bridges between that which we dream of and direct political engagement.

We must make democracy tangible in people’s everyday lives. That means investing in community-based governance, economic democracy, and local resilience networks that prove another way is possible. If we don’t offer people a vision of the world we’re fighting for, they will settle for the world that’s being imposed on them.

The resistance must be nonpartisan, broad-based, economically grounded, and people-powered. If we succeed in making it so, we can win.

This article originally appeared in The Antiauthoritarian Playbook on Substack February 5, 2025.